Merge Your Gmail Contacts Duplicates with one Click

by Harsh Agrawal on December 19, 2009

in Gmail

Gmail is no doubt one of the most popular email service globally. Last time we wrote about Access Gmail contacts with unique link.  Managing contact book is always tough specially if you have a big address book, this become impossible to manage contacts effectively.

Gmail added new feature in which you can quickly find the duplicate contacts with one click and you can easily merge them into one.

Here are the screenshots of the feature

Duplicates thumb duplicate contacts thumb

Once I clicked on Duplicate button the no. of duplicate contacts was endless in my contact book. I quickly reviewed all the result and managed to merge almost 50+ contacts.

This is very useful for people who use Gmail as their major mailing account.

Meanwhile don’t forget to see 7 Security tips to keep your Gmail account secure.

Related posts:

  1. Gmail Conctacts: Seperate Link to Access
  2. Gmail account disabled : nightmare with Gmail
  3. Become A Gmail Expert with Official Gmail Guide
  4. Location Tagging feature enabled in Gmail signature now
  5. Gmail labs new feature : Senders time zone
  6. Send any file from your computer to Gmail drive in one click
  7. Gmail Asking for Mobile number to activate Google account
  8. Gmail account disable problem


{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Technics Today.com December 19, 2009 at 16:15

Very useful post, thanks Harsh Agrawal

Reply

2 Sniff India December 19, 2009 at 21:59

this is super cool, i got loads of duplicate contacts to merge, heading straight off to gmail now :)

Reply

3 Akash | AM Blogger December 20, 2009 at 00:07

Well, that’s a nice feature. I will surely check it out. I guess I will also be getting a lot of duplicate accounts in my list, thanx for the nice post.

Reply

4 George Serradinho December 21, 2009 at 03:27

I had a look at mine now and it returned just 1 duplicate, but it was two different people. They had the same name though, it was ‘duane’. That result was not really correct.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: