<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Introduce Its own Public DNS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28562</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28562</guid>
		<description>Google DNS - that  is one very useful service by Google. Got to hand it over to the Google think tanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DNS &#8211; that  is one very useful service by Google. Got to hand it over to the Google think tanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28521</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaibhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28521</guid>
		<description>Well, you are right. Even for me, the Google DNS server has lower latency. However, when I ran performance tests (as you know) for random domain resolution queries, the performance of the two came out comparable.

This means that OpenDNS is probably much faster at resolving queries, compared to GoogleDNS. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you are right. Even for me, the Google DNS server has lower latency. However, when I ran performance tests (as you know) for random domain resolution queries, the performance of the two came out comparable.</p>
<p>This means that OpenDNS is probably much faster at resolving queries, compared to GoogleDNS. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HackIdeas</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28485</link>
		<dc:creator>HackIdeas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28485</guid>
		<description>One more good service from google. But as they more secured, hope not to get site censored. We love to browse each and every site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more good service from google. But as they more secured, hope not to get site censored. We love to browse each and every site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28481</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28481</guid>
		<description>No it will be.. Last night I made a name server change to one of my client and it name server replication was not showing in Google DNS but when I changed it to OPEN DNS I can see the name server change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it will be.. Last night I made a name server change to one of my client and it name server replication was not showing in Google DNS but when I changed it to OPEN DNS I can see the name server change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana @ Online Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana @ Online Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28475</guid>
		<description>Great service so hosting moving will be no problem again. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great service so hosting moving will be no problem again. <img src='http://www.shoutmeloud.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogrPro</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28435</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogrPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28435</guid>
		<description>Only thing to worry is our privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only thing to worry is our privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chethan</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutmeloud.com/google-introduce-its-own-public-dns.html#comment-28433</link>
		<dc:creator>Chethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutmeloud.com/?p=7980#comment-28433</guid>
		<description>Excellent ! Google introducing Public DNS!
Yiep! I would go for it!

Tweeted, Reddited and digged</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent ! Google introducing Public DNS!<br />
Yiep! I would go for it!</p>
<p>Tweeted, Reddited and digged</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

